Sign in to run estimates and review past calculations.
Volume alone gives a first estimate; median cost per case sharpens it. Every run is saved to Past calculations, so you can try multiple scenarios and compare.
These areas are the starting point, not the ceiling — Via² expands into additional service lines, each adding to the opportunity. This estimate is a conservative floor.
Testing a single "is this practice actually worth the cost?" hunch can tie up a data team for months. Via² answers those questions on demand. These numbers estimate the analyst capacity recovered — reported separately from supply savings.
Pre-data estimate — a Via² run against the prospect's own data replaces it with outcomes-validated findings.
Each band runs conservative → optimistic; the marker is the expected figure. A savings opportunity only counts if the lower-cost pathway is statistically non-inferior on length of stay, complications, readmissions, returns to surgery, and mortality.
Why a range: this is a pre-data estimate. The realized number depends on case mix, outcomes profile, and how much of the identified opportunity the teams choose to act on. Once Via² runs against the prospect's own data, the estimate is replaced by findings specific to their procedures, their surgeons, and their supply catalog — each one outcomes-validated before it's surfaced. Quality is never traded for cost. The methodology precedent is public: Intermountain’s publicly documented program realized more than $90M — Via² was built by the team behind that work.
| Date | Organization | User | Run by | Expected / yr | Range | Source |
|---|
Fill in whatever you have; volumes alone are a fine start. Save as you go — this page keeps your work, and your colleagues can sign in with the same account to add what's missing. Once you're done, the Via² team reviews your submission and returns a tailored analysis, typically within 24 hours.
Saved privately to your account. When you're ready, the Via² team reviews your submission and comes back with your tailored analysis — see the Sample results tab for a preview of what you'll receive.
| Updated | Organization | Contact | Account | Completion | Extract |
|---|
What your tailored experience looks like after the Via² team reviews your submission — a three-part walkthrough, all figures illustrative for a fictional health system (Cascade Ridge Health).
| Actual | Budget | Actual vs Budget | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Revenue ⓘ | $5,383M | $5,450M | ↓ 1.2% |
| Operating Expenses ⓘ | $5,177M | $5,232M | ↓ 1.0% |
| Operating Income ⓘ | $206M | $218M | ↓ 7.1% |
| Operating Margin % ⓘ | 3.9% | 4.2% | ↓ 7.1% |
| Supply Expense ⓘ | $791M | $801M | ↓ 13.3% |
| Supply Spend % of NPSR ⓘ | 14.69% | 14.15% | ↑ 3.7% |
| Operating Expenses / APD / CMI ⓘ | $1,826 | $1,745 | ↑ 4.6% |
| Facility | Volume | Net Revenue | Dir. Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intermountain Medical Center Hospital | 314,500 | $730.8M | $642.1M |
| LDS Hospital Hospital | 261,750 | $748.3M | $549.6M |
| Alta View Hospital Hospital | 188,000 | $458.8M | $402.2M |
| American Fork Hospital Hospital | 161,750 | $391.1M | $342.3M |
| Dixie Regional Medical Center Hospital | 215,500 | $506.4M | $467.2M |
| Utah Valley Hospital Hospital | 272,000 | $792.2M | $587.1M |
| Total | 2,169,250 | $5,383M | $4,498M |
Procedure volume, payment, cost and margin by service line
| Service Line / PCF | Procedure Volume | Avg Payment | Avg Cost | Avg Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Orthopedics 10 PCFs | 2,841 | $19,420 | $16,890 | $2,530 |
| ▸ Cardiovascular 7 PCFs | 1,842 | $28,640 | $24,180 | $4,460 |
| ▸ Spine & Neuro 6 PCFs | 1,124 | $31,200 | $27,400 | $3,800 |
| ▸ General Surgery 6 PCFs | 2,186 | $12,840 | $10,620 | $2,220 |
| ▸ Oncology 6 PCFs | 1,482 | $24,180 | $21,400 | $2,780 |
| ▸ Gynecology 5 PCFs | 986 | $14,260 | $12,180 | $2,080 |
| All Service Lines | 10,461 | $21,122 | $18,187 | $2,934 |
Year-to-date operating expense detail
| Expense Category | Cardiovascular | Orthopedics | General Surgery | Oncology | Spine & Neuro | YTD Amount | % of Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Salaries and Wages | $342.8M | $520.8M | $385.0M | $513.3M | $284.5M | $2,046.3M | 39.5% |
| Physician Support Expense | $106.0M | $160.8M | $119.0M | $158.5M | $88.0M | $632.3M | 12.2% |
| Medical Surgical Supplies | $132.5M | $201.3M | $148.8M | $198.3M | $109.8M | $790.5M | 15.3% |
| Drugs | $83.3M | $126.0M | $93.5M | $124.5M | $69.0M | $496.3M | 9.6% |
| Employee Benefits | $62.5M | $94.5M | $70.3M | $93.5M | $51.8M | $372.5M | 7.2% |
| Other Expenses | $27.3M | $41.5M | $30.5M | $40.8M | $22.5M | $162.5M | 3.1% |
| Indirect Expenses | $113.3M | $172.3M | $127.3M | $169.5M | $94.0M | $676.3M | 13.1% |
| Total Expenses | $867.5M | $1,317.0M | $974.3M | $1,298.3M | $719.5M | $5,176.5M | 100.0% |
Interactive view of historical and projected performance metrics (2023–2026)
What the prospect sees: their own portal — logo, name, and financials pre-populated. The savings figures are the door into the full ROI analysis.
The precedent: Intermountain Healthcare. A $16B health system realized more than $90M by reducing unwarranted clinical variation in surgery. The program is publicly documented and patented — Via² was built by the team that did it.
A band, not a single inflated number · 6,166 annual cases analyzed
| Service line | Cases/yr | Median supply cost | Variation (CV) | Opportunity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spine Start here | 2,462 | $7,635 | 1.08 | $2.4M – $4.6M |
| Knee Arthroplasty | 2,891 | $5,054 | 0.41 | $2.3M – $4.2M |
| Shoulder Repair | 813 | $10,174 | 0.20 | $0.5M – $1.0M |
Spine leads despite lower volume: a CV above 1.0 means case costs routinely double for equivalent procedures. Savings count only when the lower-cost pathway is statistically non-inferior on length of stay, complications, readmissions, returns to surgery, and mortality.
Set your system-wide savings target. Watch it fill as service lines come online.
Tracked per insight in the Accountability Tracker once live. Goal: $30M
Your team builds ~24 custom cost/outcome analyses a year, each tying up analysts for weeks. Via² answers those questions from validated data in seconds.
Offense, not defense: instead of months testing one hunch, your team runs a ranked list of validated opportunities to ground — and accountability tracking ties actions to financial impact, so surgeons and clinical leaders get credit for the value they generate.
Every encounter generates a signal. Every variation tells a story. Every decision has a consequence.
Via² helps health systems understand them all.
The clinical intelligence engine that earns physician trust. CliniGraph reads the full clinical encounter, not discrete codes, to build clinically comparable populations. Below: your 10 de-identified notes, read the same way.
Grouped by clinically comparable procedures, not billing codes, to reveal variation in cost and outcomes. The schedule said "lumbar fusion." The note says two-level TLIF with robotic navigation. Because the analysis reflects the true clinical context, physicians can trust the insights and act on them with confidence.
| Notes processed | 10 of 10 |
| Clinical topics extracted | 104 |
| Processing time | ~10 seconds |
| Coding integrity flags | 2 (1 under-, 1 over-coded) |
| Time for an analyst to do this manually | Weeks |
CliniGraph extracts the performed procedure from each op note and compares it to the scheduled procedure. Mismatches drive errant OR times and incorrect preference cards and supply documentation.
| Note | Scheduled procedure | Procedure in op note | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPINE-002 | Lumbar fusion, single-level | Two-level TLIF, L4-L5 and L5-S1 | Mismatch |
| KNEE-001 | Total knee arthroplasty, cemented | Total knee arthroplasty, cemented | Match |
| SHLDR-003 | Rotator cuff repair, arthroscopic | Arthroscopic cuff repair with biceps tenodesis | Partial |
In your ten notes: 1 mismatch and 1 partial match surfaced. At production scale this becomes a continuous scheduling-integrity signal — correcting block time and preference cards before the case, not after.
Decision support at time of scheduling, informed by each surgeon's own outcomes history. Revenue metrics pulled directly from Epic once live with an Epic organization. Next-best actions automated into existing EMR and management systems.
Sample data throughout — Cascade Ridge Health and Michael Okafor are fictional; all figures on these pages are illustrative. Your experience is built from your submission and your data after review by the Via² team.
Users (prospects) can run estimates and see only their own past runs. Admins see everything, manage accounts, and can delete records. Share the password with the person directly — it isn't shown again.
| Username | Role | Created | Actions |
|---|
At least 8 characters.